Is It Wikipedia A Legit Source For Students?

In today’s world, literate means knowing how to read and write. Well in today’s world it also interprets how to get through the flood of information evaluating bombarded from all over the directions. The most appropriate word that defines the modern life concern is the information fatigue syndrome or you can say it’s an info glut. 
Particularly when it comes to students, finding quality and real information has become a challenge. From many decades the students have been taught the data literacy skills that are the habit of reading and how to take help from libraries and go online.
In the present times the bombarded amount of information on the online media, its crucial than before to teach high school students how they can take leverage from the meta cognitive skills, searching, extracting verifying and in detail evaluating and comparing subjects with the digital means.
The digitized literacy skills have been preexisting taken as crucial for the studies and for the student’s future performance. 
While the academics have been discouraging the students from taking help from public search engines such as Google and everyone’s contributory information sources like Wikipedia for any reference in their assignments. It’s not a point of amazement, that students still take help from these resources. That might not be a thing to be considered bad. 
Though criticized the crowdsourcing practice of Wikipedia for choosing a quick turnaround over the trustworthiness are pressurizing the teacher to consider once the worth and reliability of the digital means or at least give a second thought of their strictness towards digital means. 
As fake as it appears for the old school bureaucrats, Wikipedia consultants argue that the subjects are more detailed reviewed in practice than even the publications made by scholars. 
Anyone can contribute to Wikipedia. While the volunteer community of reviewing, that might not appear as a community of scholars but is united for a common goal makes sure that the quality and standards are made. The influence made by the minority of critics is less likely to spoil the overall standard for a longer period.

Who evaluates the worth of knowledge? 

The traditional academic perceptive to the crowd contributed information gives rise to a serious question regarding who evaluates the trustworthiness of knowledge. Why a published article in a journal is evaluated by comparatively small, the self-employed board of academics given the reward of being more valuable than an article contributed in Wikipedia. That has been reviewed several times by thousands of professionals and readers. 
The credibility of the online information will without any doubts are different in a number of disciplines. A medical student will not depend on the information placed on the search engine. As we hope that the individuals in the medical profession extracts information from the scholarly researches and not from the top google result that can be a promotional blog or manipulative newspaper. 
Though for the highly skilled and rapidly growing sector such as information technology the interval for the journal publication and article submission and publication always means the information has been obsolete even before the release.
A student who needs to discuss the upcoming technologies will need access to and granted permission to use information that is provided through the online newspaper, the RSS feeds, blogs Wikipedia social media and websites. So the digital skills can help them separate the chaff and the wheat.

A challenge for the caretakers 

To the lack of fortune, these new means of knowledge building reveals a potential threat to being authoritative for the academic caretakers. Not too much of surprise these teachers reject Wikipedia and encourage on the use of peer-reviewed means online. The ancient practice takes up in spite of the demands from the employers and graduates who might keenly observe the credibility and trustworthiness for the online data. 
The higher education institution must train students with digitalization leveraging skills. Or the new practices of education such as MOOCs are similarly taking the prevalence, surpassing the traditional models over the period of time. As soon as the institution depends massively on the practical training such as medicine, it will retain its value the rapidly growing and changing technological fields such as IT might be at risk.


FutureEnTech is a platform to express yourself and it helps in spreading awareness about the latest technology that supports our Environment. Let's share the knowledge and help our environment. Subscribe to FutureEnTech & get the latest updates directly to your email.

FutureEnTech has 1584 posts and counting. See all posts by FutureEnTech


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *